Legal Solutions to Protect Victims of Violence and Abuse in Texas
Presenter: Honorable Judge Diane DeVasto
On any given day, Texas county jails house approximately 65,000 people.1 More than half of these individuals are typically awaiting trial, not yet having been convicted.2 Many others are misdemeanants or serving terms for nonviolent offenses. And sadly, some individuals have repeatedly returned to jail, trapped in a continuous cycle of recidivism, unprepared for a life outside of the criminal justice system without access to post-release treatment and programming. As more and more individuals are incarcerated or otherwise involved in the criminal justice system, the fiscal and human costs increase: Individuals with criminal records have difficulty finding stable employment and housing, leading to re-offending; the expenses associated with managing bloated jail populations can be extensive; and public safety and health are likewise compromised when crowded jails fail to meet the needs of incoming and exiting individuals.
Contrary to Logic, Intuition and Common Sense
The hard fact is that punishment does not reduce criminal offending.
This may be a difficult one for some to swallow, especially since the past 45 years and more than $1 trillion have been spent on punishment as the centerpiece of American criminal justice policy. We essentially bet the farm on punishing more and more criminal offenders more and more severely. Unfortunately, we lost the farm.
We missed one very important observation. The simple fact is that while punishment works for the most part on those of us who are law abiding, criminal offenders are not us.
They lack many of the opportunities, alternatives and options we have. Punishment doesn’t change many of the problems, deficits and impairment that characterize the offender population.
A number of factors came into play to keep punishment as the primary tool of criminal justice. Front and center are the political benefits of keeping the train headed in the same direction and gaining momentum. Politicians routinely claimed it worked, often accompanied by the rallying cries of “lock them up and throw away the key” and “do the crime, do the time.”
But there is overwhelming evidence of just how big of a policy failure it actually is. We have the largest prison population in the world, and the vast majority of criminal offenders, well north of 60 percent, reoffend within three years of being released from prison.
Fortunately, today we have the tools to remarkably reduce crime, recidivism, victimization and cost, if we are smart.
Criminal justice policy going forward should be based on the simple premise of accurately distinguishing between those offenders we should rightfully fear and those who just make us mad.
For those we rightfully fear — violent offenders, truly habitual offenders and those who have no interest in behavioral change — there is prison. Those are the offenders who need to be removed from society.
But for those who do not fall into the “truly fear” category, we need a different path.
The evidence is clear that the key is diversion from incarceration, accompanied by accurate screening and assessment to determine what problems need to be addressed, and providing the necessary resources to effectively change behavior. All of this needs to be done in an environment of supervision, compliance and accountability, accompanied by appropriate sanctioning for noncompliance. Sounds simple, but the devil is truly in the details.
We need to build sufficient diversion and treatment capacity, change sentencing laws to provide for much greater diversion, bring the necessary clinical expertise to the table, make judicial and prosecutorial decision making much more collaborative, and change how we think about crime and punishment.
For example, drug courts are effective at reducing substance abuse and recidivism. And they are much more cost efficient than punishment alone. However, although there are approximately 3,000 drug courts in the U.S., the capacity of these courts is sufficient to address only about 10 percent of the need.
Large percentages of criminal offenders have substance abuse problems, are mentally ill, or have neurocognitive impairments and deficits. Unemployment, poor education and occasionally homelessness also plague offenders. Current policies do little to change any of these problems. Comprehensive, systematic change to the criminal justice system is required if we want to enhance public safety and reduce cost.
Every presidential candidate, Republican and Democratic, has chimed in on criminal justice reform, but none seems to grasp the big picture. The American criminal justice system is a massive failure that requires a comprehensive solution.
We have an opportunity today to get smart about crime and criminal justice policy. We have an effective path forward that is based on scientific evidence. What we appear to lack is the willingness to embrace the solution with the enthusiasm and resources with which we embraced “tough on crime” 45 years ago.
Hope for Children Foundation Board of Directors